LD 2245
pg. 254
Page 253 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 255 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
Example 2: Debtor maintains a deposit account with Bank A.
The deposit account is subject to a perfected security interest
in favor of Lender. At Bank B's suggestion, Debtor moves the
funds from the account at Bank A to Debtor's deposit account with
Bank B. Unless Bank B acted in collusion with Debtor in
violating Lender's rights, Bank B takes the funds (the credits
running in favor of Bank B) free from Lender's security interest.
See subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)]. However,
inasmuch as the deposit account maintained with Bank B
constitutes the proceeds of the deposit account at Bank A,
Lender's security interest would attach to that account as
proceeds. See Section 9-315 [Maine cite section 9-1315].

 
Subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)] also would apply
if, in the example, Bank A debited Debtor's deposit account in
exchange for the issuance of Bank A's cashier's check. Lender's
security interest would attach to the cashier's check as proceeds
of the deposit account, and the rules applicable to instruments
would govern any competing claims to the cashier's check. See,
e.g., Sections 3-306, 9-322, 9-330, 9-331 [Maine cite sections 9-
1322, 9-1330, 9-1331].

 
If Debtor withdraws money (currency) from an encumbered
deposit account and transfers the money to a third party, then
subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection (1)], to the extent not
displaced by federal law relating to money, applies. It contains
the same rule as subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)].

 
Subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)] applies to
transfers of funds from a deposit account; it does not apply to
transfers of the deposit account itself or of an interest
therein. For example, this section does not apply to the
creation of a security interest in a deposit account. Competing
claims to the deposit account itself are dealt with by other
Article 9 [Maine cite Article 9-A] priority rules. See Sections
9-317(a), 9-327, 9-340, 9-341 [Maine cite section 9-1317,
subsection (1), section 9-1327, 9-1340, 9-1341]. Similarly, a
corporate merger normally would not result in a transfer of funds
from a deposit account. Rather, it might result in a transfer of
the deposit account itself. If so, the normal rules applicable
to transferred collateral would apply; this section would not.

 
3. Policy. Broad protection for transferees helps to ensure
that security interests in deposit accounts do not impair the
free flow of funds. It also minimizes the likelihood that a
secured party will enjoy a claim to whatever the transferee
purchases with the funds. Rules concerning recovery of payments
traditionally have placed a high value on finality. The
opportunity to upset a completed transaction, or even to place a
completed transaction
in jeopardy by bringing suit against the


Page 253 of 493 Top of Page Page 255 of 493