LD 2245
pg. 255
Page 254 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 256 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
transferee of funds, should be severely limited. Although the
giving of value usually is a prerequisite for receiving the
ability to take free from third-party claims, where payments are
concerned the law is even more protective. Thus, Section 3-
418(c) provides that, even where the law of restitution otherwise
would permit recovery of funds paid by mistake, no recovery may
be had from a person "who in good faith changed position in
reliance on the payment." Rather than adopt this standard, this
section eliminates all reliance requirements whatsoever.
Payments made by mistake are relatively rare, but payments of
funds from encumbered deposit accounts (e.g., deposit accounts
containing collections from accounts receivable) occur with great
regularity. In the mine run of cases, unlike payment by mistake,
no one would object to these payments. In the vast proportion of
cases, the transferee probably would be able to show a change of
position in reliance on the payment. This section does not put
the transferee to the burden of having to make this proof.

 
4. "Bad Actors." To deal with the question of the "bad
actor," this section borrows "collusion" language from Article 8.
See, e.g., Sections 8-115, 8-503(e). This is the most protective
(i.e., least stringent) of the various standards now found in the
UCC. Compare, e.g., Section 1-201(9) ("without knowledge that
the sale . . . is in violation of the . . . security interest");
Section 1-201(19) ("honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction
concerned"); Section 3-302(a)(2)(v) ("without notice of any
claim").

 
5. Transferee Who Does Not Take Free. This section sets
forth the circumstances under which certain transferees of money
or funds take free of security interests. It does not determine
the rights of a transferee who does not take free of a security
interest.

 
Example 3: The facts are as in Example 2, but, in wrongfully
moving the funds from the deposit account at Bank A to Debtor's
deposit account with Bank B, Debtor acts in collusion with Bank
B. Bank B does not take the funds free of Lender's security
interest under this section. If Debtor grants a security
interest to Bank B, Section 9-327 [Maine cite section 9-1327]
governs the relative priorities of Lender and Bank B. Under
Section 9-327(3) [Maine cite section 9-1327, subsection (3)],
Bank B's security interest in the Bank B deposit account is
senior to Lender's security interest in the deposit account as
proceeds. However, Bank B's senior security interest does not
protect Bank B against any liability to Lender that might arise
from Bank B's wrongful conduct.

 
§9-1333.__Priority of certain liens arising by operation of law


Page 254 of 493 Top of Page Page 256 of 493