LD 2245
pg. 79
Page 78 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 80 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
causing the seller to provide the proof required under that
section. This Article rejects decisions reaching a contrary
result, e.g., Dennis Joslin Co. v. Robinson Broadcasting, 977 F.
Supp. 491 (D.D.C. 1997).

 
Nothing in this section or any other provision of Article 9
[Maine cite Article 9-A] prevents the transfer of full and
complete ownership of an account, chattel paper, an instrument,
or a payment intangible in a transaction of sale. However, as
mentioned in Comment 4, neither this Article nor the definition
of "security interest" in Section 1-201 provides rules for
distinguishing sales transactions from those that create a
security interest securing an obligation. This Article applies
to both types of transactions. The principal effect of this
coverage is to apply this Article's perfection and priority rules
to these sales transactions. Use of terminology such as
"security interest," "debtor," and "collateral" is merely a
drafting convention adopted to reach this end, and its use has no
relevance to distinguishing sales from other transactions. See
PEB Commentary No. 14.

 
Following a debtor's outright sale and transfer of ownership
of a receivable, the debtor-seller retains no legal or equitable
rights in the receivable that has been sold. See Section 9-
318(a) [Maine cite section 9-1318, subsection (1)]. This is so
whether or not the buyer's security interest is perfected. (A
security interest arising from the sale of a promissory note or
payment intangible is perfected upon attachment without further
action. See Section 9-309 [Maine cite section 9-1309].)
However, if the buyer's interest in accounts or chattel paper is
unperfected, a subsequent lien creditor, perfected secured party,
or qualified buyer can reach the sold receivable and achieve
priority over (or take free of) the buyer's unperfected security
interest under Section 9-317 [Maine cite section 9-1317]. This
is so not because the seller of a receivable retains rights in
the property sold; it does not. Nor is this so because the
seller of a receivable is a "debtor" and the buyer of a
receivable is a "secured party" under this Article (they are).
It is so for the simple reason that Sections 9-318(b), 9-317, and
9-322 [Maine cite section 9-1318, subsection (2), section 9-1317
and section 9-1322] make it so, as did former Sections 9-301 and
9-312 [Maine cite sections 9-1301 and 9-1312]. Because the
buyer's security interest is unperfected, for purposes of
determining the rights of creditors of and purchasers for value
from the debtor-seller, under Section 9-318(b) [Maine cite
section 9-1318, subsection (2)] the debtor-seller is deemed to
have the rights and title it sold. Section 9-317 [Maine cite
section 9-1317] subjects the buyer's unperfected interest in
accounts and chattel paper to that of the debtor-seller's lien
creditor and other persons who qualify under that section.


Page 78 of 493 Top of Page Page 80 of 493