LD 2487
pg. 6
Page 5 of 30 An Act to Amend the Jurisdiction of the District Court Page 7 of 30
Download Bill Text
LR 3308
Item 1

 
to the party that could have been taken before the enactment of
former section 1155 by the agency involved in the hearing.

 
Every final decision of the District Court must be in writing or
stated in the record and must include findings of fact and
conclusions of law sufficient to apprise the parties and any
interested member of the public of the basis for the decision.__A
copy of the decision must be delivered or promptly mailed to each
party to the proceeding or their representatives of record.
Written notice of the party's rights to review of the decision
and of the action required and the time within which that action
must be taken in order to exercise the right of review must be
given to each party together with the decision.

 
8.__Fines.__Notwithstanding any other provisions of this
chapter, the District Court may impose a fine of a specific sum,
which may not be less than $50 nor more than $1,500 for any one
offense or as may be provided by the statutes relating to the
licensing question. Such a fine may be imposed instead of or in
addition to any suspension, revocation or modification of a
license by the court.__Section 1057 applies to any fine imposed
by this subsection.

 
9.__Rules of procedure.__The Supreme Judicial Court may adopt,
amend, repeal or modify rules governing the forms of complaints,
pleadings and motions and the practice, procedure and evidence in
and appeals from the District Court. The rules may not abridge or
enlarge the substantive rights of any litigant. The rules must be
filed with the Secretary of State in the manner required by Title
5, section 8056, subsection 1, paragraph B.

 
Sec. 12. 4 MRSA §454, first ¶, as amended by PL 1997, c. 134, §6, is
further amended to read:

 
There is established a Maine Criminal Justice Sentencing
Institute under the administrative supervision of the State Court
Administrator to provide a continuing forum for the regular
discussion of the most appropriate methods of sentencing
convicted offenders and adjudicated juveniles by judges in the
criminal justice system, prosecutors, law enforcement and
correctional personnel, representatives of advisory and advocacy
groups and such representatives of the defense bar as the Chief
Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court may invite. All Supreme
Judicial Court, Superior Court, and District Court and
Administrative Court Judges, all District Attorneys and attorneys
within the Criminal Division of the Office of the Attorney
General are, and such other criminal justice personnel as the
Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court may authorize may be,
members of the institute.


Page 5 of 30 Top of Page Page 7 of 30