Subsection (b) reiterates that the issuing State has jurisdiction to serve as a responding State to enforce its own order at the request of another State.

The 2001 amendments moved the second sentence in Subsection (b) to Section 210, infra, and moved Subsection (c) to Section 211, infra.

§2967.__Determination of controlling child support orders

1.__Recognition of orders; one tribunal.__If a proceeding is brought under this chapter and only one tribunal has issued a child support order, the order of that tribunal controls and must be so recognized.

2.__Recognition of orders; 2 or more tribunals.__If a proceeding is brought under this chapter and 2 or more child support orders have been issued by tribunals of this State or another state with regard to the same obligor and same child, a tribunal of this State having personal jurisdiction over both the obligor and individual obligee shall apply the following rules and by order shall determine which order controls.

A.__If only one of the tribunals has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction under this chapter, the order of that tribunal controls and must be so recognized.

B.__If more than one of the tribunals has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction under this chapter:

(1)__An order issued by a tribunal in the home state of the child controls; or

(2)__If an order has not been issued in the home state of the child, the order most recently issued controls.

C.__If none of the tribunals have continuing, exclusive jurisdiction under this chapter, the tribunal of this State shall issue a child support order, which controls.

3.__Request for order.__If 2 or more child support orders have been issued for the same obligor and same child, upon request of a party who is an individual or a support enforcement agency, a tribunal of this State having personal jurisdiction over both the obligor and the obligee who is an individual shall