| This section is the correlative of the continuing, exclusive |
| jurisdiction asserted in the preceding section. It makes the |
| relatively subtle distinction between the CEJ "to modify a |
| support order" established in Section 205 and the "continuing |
| jurisdiction to enforce" established in this section. A |
| keystone of UIFSA is that the power to enforce the order of |
| the issuing State is not "exclusive" with that State. Rather, |
| on request one or more responding States may also exercise |
| authority to enforce the order of the issuing State. Secondly, |
| under the one-order-at-a-time system, the validity and |
| enforceability of the controlling order continues unabated |
| until it is fully complied with, unless it is replaced by a |
| modified order issued in accordance with the standards |
| established by Sections 609-615. That is, even if the |
| individual parties and the child no longer reside in the |
| issuing State, the controlling order remains in effect and may |
| be enforced by the issuing State or any responding State |
| without regard to the fact that the potential |
| for its modification and replacement exists. The 2001 |
| amendments to Subsection (a) authorize the issuing tribunal to |
| initiate a |