| The Mediation Act results from an historic collaboration. |
| The Uniform Law Commission Drafting Committee, chaired by |
| Judge Michael B. Getty, was joined in the drafting of this Act |
| by a Drafting Committee sponsored by the American Bar |
| Association, working through its Section of Dispute |
| Resolution, which was co-chaired by former American Bar |
| Association President Roberta Cooper Ramo (Modrall, Sperling, |
| Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A.) and Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer |
| of the Supreme Court of Ohio. The leadership of both |
| organizations had recognized that the time was ripe for a |
| uniform law on mediation. While both Drafting Committees were |
| independent, they worked side by side, sharing resources and |
| expertise in a collaboration that augmented the work of both |
| Drafting Committees by broadening the diversity of their |
| perspectives. See Michael B. Getty, Thomas J. Moyer & Roberta |
| Cooper Ramo, Preface to Symposium on Drafting a Uniform/Model |
| Mediation Act, 13 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 787 (1998). For |
| instance, the Drafting Committees represented various contexts |
| in which mediation is used: private mediation, court-related |
| mediation, community mediation, and corporate mediation. |
| Similarly, they also embraced a spectrum of viewpoints about |
| the goals of mediation - efficiency for the parties and the |
| courts, the enhancement of the possibility of fundamental |
| reconciliation of the parties, and the enrichment of society |
| through the use of less adversarial means of resolving |
| disputes. They also included a range of viewpoints about how |
| mediation is to be conducted, including, for example, strong |
| proponents of both the evaluative and facilitative models of |
| mediation, as well as supporters and opponents of mandatory |
| mediation. |