| The Mediation Act results from an historic collaboration. |
The Uniform Law Commission Drafting Committee, chaired by |
Judge Michael B. Getty, was joined in the drafting of this Act |
by a Drafting Committee sponsored by the American Bar |
Association, working through its Section of Dispute |
Resolution, which was co-chaired by former American Bar |
Association President Roberta Cooper Ramo (Modrall, Sperling, |
Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A.) and Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer |
of the Supreme Court of Ohio. The leadership of both |
organizations had recognized that the time was ripe for a |
uniform law on mediation. While both Drafting Committees were |
independent, they worked side by side, sharing resources and |
expertise in a collaboration that augmented the work of both |
Drafting Committees by broadening the diversity of their |
perspectives. See Michael B. Getty, Thomas J. Moyer & Roberta |
Cooper Ramo, Preface to Symposium on Drafting a Uniform/Model |
Mediation Act, 13 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 787 (1998). For |
instance, the Drafting Committees represented various contexts |
in which mediation is used: private mediation, court-related |
mediation, community mediation, and corporate mediation. |
Similarly, they also embraced a spectrum of viewpoints about |
the goals of mediation - efficiency for the parties and the |
courts, the enhancement of the possibility of fundamental |
reconciliation of the parties, and the enrichment of society |
through the use of less adversarial means of resolving |
disputes. They also included a range of viewpoints about how |
mediation is to be conducted, including, for example, strong |
proponents of both the evaluative and facilitative models of |
mediation, as well as supporters and opponents of mandatory |
mediation. |