Some states have already adopted similar prohibitions. See, |
e.g., Cal. Evid. Code Section 1121 (West 1997); Fla. Stat. |
Ann. Section 373.71 (1999) (water resources); Tex. Civ. Prac. |
& Rem. Code Section 154.053 (c) (West 1999) (general). |
Disclosures of mediation communications to a judge also could |
run afoul of prohibitions against ex parte communications with |
judges. See Code of Conduct for Federal Judges, Canon 3(A)(3), |
175 F.R.D. 364, 367 (1998); American Bar Association Model |
Code of Conduct of Judicial Conduct at 9. The purpose of this |
Section is consistent with the conclusions of seminal reports |
in the mediation field condemn the use of such reports as |
permitting coercion by the mediator and destroying confidence |
in the neutrality of the mediator and in the mediation |
process. See Society for Professionals in Dispute Resolution, |
Mandated Participation and Settlement Coercion: Dispute |
Resolution as it Relates to the Courts (1991); Center for |
Dispute Settlement, National Standards for Court-Connected |
Mediation Programs (D.C. 1992). |