LD 1295
pg. 51
Page 50 of 67 An Act To Enact the Uniform Mediation Act Page 52 of 67
Download Bill Text
LR 464
Item 1

 
3.__Communication may not be considered.__A communication
made in violation of subsection 1 may not be considered by a
court, administrative agency or arbitrator.

 
REPORTER'S NOTES

 
1. Section 7. Disclosures by the mediator to an authority that
may make a ruling on the dispute being mediated.

 
Section 7(a) prohibits communications by the mediator in
prescribed circumstances. In contrast to the privilege, which
gives a right to refuse to provide evidence in a subsequent
legal proceeding, this Section creates a prohibition against
disclosure.

 
Some states have already adopted similar prohibitions. See,
e.g., Cal. Evid. Code Section 1121 (West 1997); Fla. Stat.
Ann. Section 373.71 (1999) (water resources); Tex. Civ. Prac.
& Rem. Code Section 154.053 (c) (West 1999) (general).
Disclosures of mediation communications to a judge also could
run afoul of prohibitions against ex parte communications with
judges. See Code of Conduct for Federal Judges, Canon 3(A)(3),
175 F.R.D. 364, 367 (1998); American Bar Association Model
Code of Conduct of Judicial Conduct at 9. The purpose of this
Section is consistent with the conclusions of seminal reports
in the mediation field condemn the use of such reports as
permitting coercion by the mediator and destroying confidence
in the neutrality of the mediator and in the mediation
process. See Society for Professionals in Dispute Resolution,
Mandated Participation and Settlement Coercion: Dispute
Resolution as it Relates to the Courts (1991); Center for
Dispute Settlement, National Standards for Court-Connected
Mediation Programs (D.C. 1992).

 
Importantly, the prohibition is limited to reports or other
listed communications to those who may rule on the dispute
being mediated. While the mediators are thus constrained in
terms of reports to courts and others that may make rulings on
the case, they are not prohibited from reporting threatened
harm to appropriate authorities, for example, if learned
during a mediation to settle a civil dispute. In this regard,
Section 7(b)(3) responds to public concerns about clarity and
makes explicit what is otherwise implied in the Act, that
mediators are not constrained by this Section in their ability
to disclose threats to the safety and well being of vulnerable
parties to appropriate public authorities, and is consistent
with the exception for disclosure in proceedings in Section
6(a)(7). Similarly, while the provision prohibits mediators
from making
these reports, it does not constrain the parties.


Page 50 of 67 Top of Page Page 52 of 67