LD 509
pg. 21
Page 20 of 183 An Act To Adopt the Maine Uniform Securities Act Page 22 of 183
Download Bill Text
LR 441
Item 1

 
(1)__The assignment, transfer, sale, devise or bequest of
a death benefit, life insurance policy or certificate of
insurance by the viator to the viatical settlement
provider pursuant to the Viatical and Life Settlements
Act;

 
(2)__The assignment, transfer, sale, devise or bequest
of a life insurance policy, for any value less than the
expected death benefit, by the viator to a friend or
family member who enters into no more than one such
agreement in a calendar year;

 
(3)__An assignment of a life insurance policy to a
supervised lender, as defined in Title 9-A, section 1-
301, subsection 39, as collateral for a loan; or

 
(4)__The exercise of accelerated benefits pursuant to
the terms of the Maine Insurance Code and of a life
insurance policy.

 
For purposes of this chapter, the individual insured who is the
subject of the insurance policy or certificate of insurance does
not have to be diagnosed as terminally ill or chronically ill at
the time a settlement contract is executed.

 
Official Comments

 
Prior Provisions: 1956 Act Section 401; RUSA 101.

 
1. Under Section 605(a) the administrator has the power to
define by rule any term, whether or not used in this Act, as long
as the definitions are not inconsistent with the Act.

 
2. All definitions include corresponding meanings. For
example, "filing" would include "file" or "filed"; "sale" would
include "sell."

 
3. Prefatory Phrase: "In this [Act], unless the context
otherwise requires": Prior Provisions: 1956 Act Section 401
Preface; RUSA Section 101 Preface. This prefatory phrase which is
in the counterpart provisions of the federal securities statutes,
see, e.g., Securities Act of 1933 Section 2(a), provides the
basis for the courts to take into account the statutory and
factual context of each definition, see, e.g., Reves v. Ernst &
Young, 494 U.S. 56 (1990); 2 Louis Loss & Joel Seligman,
Securities Regulation 927-929 (3d ed. rev. 1999), and will allow
the courts to harmonize this Act's definitions with the
counterpart federal securities definitions to the extent
appropriate. Cf. Akin v. Q-L Inv., Inc., 959 F.2d 521, 532 (5th


Page 20 of 183 Top of Page Page 22 of 183