LD 509
pg. 22
Page 21 of 183 An Act To Adopt the Maine Uniform Securities Act Page 23 of 183
Download Bill Text
LR 441
Item 1

 
Cir. 1992) ("Texas courts generally look to decisions of the
federal courts to interpret the Texas Securities Act because of
obvious similarities between the state and federal laws"); Koch v
Koch Indus., Inc. 203 F.3d 1202, 1235 (10th Cir. 2000) (following
federal definition of materiality); Biales v. Young, 432 S.E.2d
482, 484 (S.C. 1993) ("Section 35-1-1490(2) is substantially
similar to Section 12(1) of the Federal Securities Act").

 
4. Section 102(2): Agent: Prior Provisions: 1956 Act Section
401(b); RUSA Section 101(14). Section (102)(2), in part, follows
the 1956 Act definition. The 1956 Act used the term "agent" while
the RUSA Section 101(14) used the term "sales representative."
Given the broader enactment of the 1956 Act, this Act also uses
the term "agent." Certain exclusions from the 1956 Act are
exemptions in this Act. See Section 402(b).

 
Whether a particular individual who represents a broker-dealer
or issuer is an "agent" depends upon much the same factors that
create an agency relationship at common law. See, e.g., Norwest
Bank Hastings v. Clapp, 394 N.W.2d 176, 179 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986)
(following Official Comment that establishing agency under the
Uniform Securities Act "depends upon much the same factors which
create an agency relationship at common law"); Shaughnessy & Co.,
Inc. v. Commissioner of Sec., 1971-1978 Blue Sky L. Rep. (CCH)
¶71,348 (Wis. Cir. Ct. 1977) (unlicenced person who took
information relevant to securities transactions and turned it
over to securities agents was himself an agent).

 
An individual can be an agent for a broker-dealer or issuer
for a purpose other than effecting or attempting to effect
purchases or sales of securities and not be a statutory agent
under this Act. See, e.g., Baker, Watts & Co. v. Miles &
Stockridge, 620 A.2d 356, 367 (Md. Ct. App. 1993) (attorney-
client relationship is generally one of agency, but that alone
does not bring an attorney within securities act definition of
agent). An individual will not be an agent under Section 102(2)
because of the person's status as a partner, officer, or director
of a broker-dealer or issuer if such an individual does not
effect or attempt to effect purchases or sales of securities.
See, e.g., Abell v. Potomac Ins. Co., 858 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir.
1988).

 
Section 102(2) is intended to include any individual who acts
as an agent, whether or not the individual is an employee or
independent contractor. Cf. Hollinger v. Titan Capital Corp., 914
F.2d 1564 (9th Cir. en banc 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 976
(1991).

 
The word "individual" in the definition of the term "agent" is
limited to human beings and does not include a juridical


Page 21 of 183 Top of Page Page 23 of 183