LD 1609
pg. 76
Page 75 of 148 An Act To Establish the Uniform Partnership Act Page 77 of 148
Download Bill Text
LR 1469
Item 1

 
4. Subsection (d) is new. It makes clear that unless otherwise
agreed the partner whose interest is transferred retains all of the
rights and duties of a partner, other than the right to receive
distributions. That means the transferor is entitled to
participate in the management of the partnership and remains
personally liable for all partnership obligations, unless and until
he withdraws as a partner, is expelled under Section 601(4)(ii), or
is otherwise dissociated under Section 601.

 
A divorced spouse of a partner who is awarded rights in the
partner's partnership interest as part of a property settlement
is entitled only to the rights of a transferee. The spouse may
instead be granted a money judgment in the amount of the property
award, enforceable by a charging order in the same manner as any
other money judgment against a partner. In neither case,
however, would the spouse become a partner by virtue of the
property settlement or succeed to any of the partner's management
rights. See, e.g., Warren v. Warren, 12 Ark. App. 260, 675
S.W.2d 371 (1984).

 
5. Subsection (e) is new and provides that the partnership
has no duty to give effect to the transferee's rights until the
partnership receives notice of the transfer. This is consistent
with UCC Section 9318(3), which provides that an "account debtor"
is authorized to pay the assignor until the account debtor
receives notification that the amount due or to become due has
been assigned and that payment is to be made to the assignee. It
further provides that the assignee, on request, must furnish
reasonable proof of the assignment.

 
6. Subsection (f) is new and provides that a transfer of a
partner's transferable interest in the partnership in violation
of a restriction on transfer contained in a partnership agreement
is ineffective as to a person with timely notice of the
restriction. Under Section 103(a), the partners may agree among
themselves to restrict the right to transfer their partnership
interests. Subsection (f) makes explicit that a transfer in
violation of such a restriction is ineffective as to a transferee
with notice of the restriction. See Section 102(b) for the
meaning of "notice." RUPA leaves to general law and the UCC the
issue of whether a transfer in violation of a valid restriction
is effective as to a transferee without notice of the
restriction.

 
Whether a particular restriction will be enforceable, however,
must be considered in light of other law. See 11 U.S.C. §
541(c)(1) (property owned by bankrupt passes to trustee
regardless of restrictions on transfer); UCC § 9318(4) (agreement
between account debtor and assignor prohibiting creation of
security interest in a general intangible or requiring account


Page 75 of 148 Top of Page Page 77 of 148