debtor's consent is ineffective); Battista v. Carlo, 57 Misc. 2d |
495, 293 N.Y.S.2d 227 (1968) (restriction on transfer of |
partnership interest subject to rules against unreasonable |
restraints on alienation of property) (dictum); Tupper v. Kroc, 88 |
Nev. 146, 494 P.2d 1275 (1972) (partnership interest subject to |
charging order even if partnership agreement prohibits |
assignments). Cf. TuVu Drive-In Corp. v. Ashkins, 61 Cal. 2d 283, |
38 Cal. Rptr. 348, 391 P.2d 828 (1964) (restraints on transfer of |
corporate stock must be reasonable). Even if a restriction on the |
transfer of a partner's transferable interest in a partnership were |
held to be unenforceable, the transfer might be grounds for |
expelling the partner-transferor from the partnership under Section |
601(5)(ii). |