A. Pursue, in appropriate regional and federal forums, market and rule changes that will reduce the basis differential for gas coming into New England and increase the efficiency with which gas brought into New England and Maine is transmitted, distributed and used. If the commission concludes that those market or rule changes will, within the same time frame, achieve substantially the same cost reduction effects for Maine electricity and gas customers as the execution of an energy cost reduction contract, the commission may not execute an energy cost reduction contract;   [PL 2015, c. 329, Pt. E, §1 (AMD).]

B. Explore all reasonable opportunities for private participation in securing additional gas pipeline capacity that would achieve the objectives in subsection 2. If the commission concludes that private transactions, within the same time frame, achieve substantially the same cost reduction effects for Maine electricity and gas customers as the execution of an energy cost reduction contract, the commission may not execute an energy cost reduction contract; and   [PL 2015, c. 329, Pt. E, §1 (AMD).]

C. In consultation with the Public Advocate and the Governor's Energy Office, hire a consultant with expertise in natural gas markets to make recommendations regarding the execution of an energy cost reduction contract. The commission shall consider those recommendations as part of an adjudicatory proceeding under subsection 2.   [PL 2013, c. 369, Pt. B, §1 (NEW).]

A. Pursue, in appropriate regional and federal forums, market and rule changes that will reduce the reliability risk faced by off-system natural gas users or on-system consumers and will provide a physical hedge to higher priced on-peak, winter period natural gas supplies. If the commission concludes that those market or rule changes will, within the same time frame, achieve substantially the same cost reduction effects for the State's electricity and gas customers as the execution of a physical energy storage contract, the commission may not execute a physical energy storage contract; and   [PL 2015, c. 445, §5 (NEW).]

B. Explore all reasonable opportunities for private participation that would achieve the objectives in subsection 2‑A. If the commission concludes that private transactions, within the same time frame, achieve substantially the same cost reduction effects for the State's electricity and gas customers as the execution of a physical energy storage contract, the commission may not execute a physical energy storage contract.   [PL 2015, c. 445, §5 (NEW).]

A. Materially enhance natural gas transmission capacity into the State or into the ISO-NE region and that additional capacity will be economically beneficial to electricity consumers, natural gas consumers or both in the State and that the overall costs of the energy cost reduction contract are outweighed by its benefits to electricity consumers, natural gas consumers or both in the State; and   [PL 2015, c. 445, §5 (AMD).]

B. Enhance electrical and natural gas reliability in the State.   [PL 2013, c. 369, Pt. B, §1 (NEW).]

A. Materially enhance liquefied natural gas storage capacity in the State or the ISO-NE region and ensure that additional physical energy storage capacity will be economically beneficial to electricity consumers, natural gas consumers or both in the State and that the overall costs of the contract are outweighed by its benefits to electricity consumers, natural gas consumers or both in the State;   [PL 2015, c. 445, §5 (NEW).]

B. Provide the opportunity for access to lower cost natural gas at times of regional peak demand for natural gas supplies or in the event of upstream natural gas infrastructure disruption; and   [PL 2015, c. 445, §5 (NEW).]

C. Enhance electrical and natural gas reliability in the State.   [PL 2015, c. 445, §5 (NEW).]

A. The commission may direct one or more transmission and distribution utilities, gas utilities or natural gas pipeline utilities to be a counterparty to an energy cost reduction contract or a physical energy storage contract, or both. In determining whether and to what extent to direct a utility to be a counterparty to one or more contracts under this subsection, the commission shall consider the anticipated reduction in the price of gas or electricity or a reduction in the on-peak winter period price of gas or electricity, as applicable, accruing to the customers of the utility as a result of one or more contracts as determined by the commission in an adjudicatory proceeding.  

B. If the commission concludes that an energy cost reduction contract or a physical energy storage contract can be achieved with the participation of other entities, the commission may contract jointly with other entities, including other state agencies and instrumentalities, governments in other states and nations, utilities and generators.   [PL 2015, c. 445, §5 (AMD).]

C. The commission may execute an energy cost reduction contract or a physical energy storage contract as a principal and counterparty.   [PL 2015, c. 445, §5 (AMD).]