LD 1871
pg. 7
Page 6 of 8 An Act to Revise Procedures for Probation Revocation Page 8 of 8
Download Bill Text
LR 1586
Item 1

 
SUMMARY

 
This bill restructures the laws governing probation revocation
and probation violation. It separates the procedures for
probation revocation by arrest and by summons. The bill also
makes the following substantive changes.

 
Currently, a person arrested for violation of probation may be
incarcerated indefinitely upon the holding of a preliminary
hearing, a procedure conducted by officials of the Department of
Corrections in the facility where the probationer is
incarcerated. No deadline currently exists for the filing of a
motion for probation revocation with respect to a person
incarcerated after a preliminary hearing or for that person's
appearance in court. This can result in an undue length of time
passing before such a person is brought before a judge or justice
and given the opportunity to request that counsel be appointed
and to request bail. This bill requires that when a person
arrested for a violation of probation is held subsequent to a
preliminary hearing, the motion for probation revocation must be
filed within 5 days of the arrest. In addition, when such a
person is not sooner released, an initial appearance must be held
by the court within 14 days of the arrest.

 
Current law does not provide for an initial appearance,
separate from the final hearing, on a motion to revoke probation.
Nevertheless, courts have developed a routine practice of
conducting initial appearances on motions for revocation of
probation. The bill codifies the practice that has developed and
sets forth procedures governing initial appearances on motions to
revoke probation.

 
The bill also makes clear that a court may find a violation of
probation, but nevertheless utilize none of the initially
suspended sentence. This commonly occurs when a person on
probation admits a violation of probation but, prior to final
disposition, remedies the situation to the satisfaction of the
attorney for the State and the court, for example, by paying
restitution owed. The bill eliminates an ambiguity that exists
under current law as to whether this practice is authorized. The
bill also makes clear that the running of the period of probation
is tolled between the date the proceedings are commenced and the
date of final disposition, even if no part of the original
suspension order is modified.

 
Finally, the bill provides the same protection to persons
entering into an agreement with the attorney for the State for
disposition of a motion to revoke probation as is currently
provided under the Maine Rules of Criminal Procedure for persons


Page 6 of 8 Top of Page Page 8 of 8