| | 7. Security Interest in Obligation Secured by Non-Article 9 | Transaction. Subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)] is | unchanged in substance from former Section 9-102(3) [Maine cite | section 9-1102, subsection (3)]. The following example provides | an illustration. |
|
| | Example 1: O borrows $10,000 from M and secures its repayment | obligation, evidenced by a promissory note, by granting to M a | mortgage on O's land. This Article does not apply to the creation | of the real-property mortgage. However, if M sells the | promissory note to X or gives a security interest in the note to | secure M's own obligation to X, this Article applies to the | security interest thereby created in favor of X. The security | interest in the promissory note is covered by this Article even | though the note is secured by a real-property mortgage. Also, | X's security interest in the note gives X an attached security | interest in the mortgage lien that secures the note and, if the | security interest in the note is perfected, the security interest | in the mortgage lien likewise is perfected. See Sections 9-203, | 9-308 [Maine cite sections 9-1203, 9-1308]. |
|
| It also follows from subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)] | that an attempt to obtain or perfect a security interest in a | secured obligation by complying with non-Article 9 law, as by an | assignment of record of a real-property mortgage, would be | ineffective. Finally, it is implicit from subsection (b) [Maine | cite subsection (2)] that one cannot obtain a security interest | in a lien, such as a mortgage on real property, that is not also | coupled with an equally effective security interest in the | secured obligation. This Article rejects cases such as In re | Maryville Savings & Loan Corp., 743 F.2d 413 (6th Cir. 1984), | clarified on reconsideration, 760 F.2d 119 (1985). |
|
| | 8. Federal Preemption. Former Section 9-104(a) [Maine cite | section 9-1104, subsection (1)] excluded from Article 9 [Maine | cite Article 9-A] "a security interest subject to any statute of | the United States, to the extent that such statute governs the | rights of parties to and third parties affected by transactions | in particular types of property." Some (erroneously) read the | former section to suggest that Article 9 sometimes deferred to | federal law even when federal law did not preempt Article 9. | Subsection (c)(1) [Maine cite subsection (3), paragraph (a)] | recognizes explicitly that this Article defers to federal law | only when and to the extent that it must-i.e., when federal law | preempts it. |
|
| | 9. Governmental Debtors. Former Section 9104(e) excluded | transfers by governmental debtors. It has been revised and | replaced by the exclusions in new paragraphs (2) and (3) of | subsection (c) [Maine cite paragraphs (b) and (c) of subsection |
|
|