LD 2245
pg. 81
Page 80 of 493 An Act to Adopt the Model Revised Article 9 Secured Transactions Page 82 of 493
Download Bill Text
LR 1087
Item 1

 
7. Security Interest in Obligation Secured by Non-Article 9
Transaction. Subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)] is
unchanged in substance from former Section 9-102(3) [Maine cite
section 9-1102, subsection (3)]. The following example provides
an illustration.

 
Example 1: O borrows $10,000 from M and secures its repayment
obligation, evidenced by a promissory note, by granting to M a
mortgage on O's land. This Article does not apply to the creation
of the real-property mortgage. However, if M sells the
promissory note to X or gives a security interest in the note to
secure M's own obligation to X, this Article applies to the
security interest thereby created in favor of X. The security
interest in the promissory note is covered by this Article even
though the note is secured by a real-property mortgage. Also,
X's security interest in the note gives X an attached security
interest in the mortgage lien that secures the note and, if the
security interest in the note is perfected, the security interest
in the mortgage lien likewise is perfected. See Sections 9-203,
9-308 [Maine cite sections 9-1203, 9-1308].

 
It also follows from subsection (b) [Maine cite subsection (2)]
that an attempt to obtain or perfect a security interest in a
secured obligation by complying with non-Article 9 law, as by an
assignment of record of a real-property mortgage, would be
ineffective. Finally, it is implicit from subsection (b) [Maine
cite subsection (2)] that one cannot obtain a security interest
in a lien, such as a mortgage on real property, that is not also
coupled with an equally effective security interest in the
secured obligation. This Article rejects cases such as In re
Maryville Savings & Loan Corp., 743 F.2d 413 (6th Cir. 1984),
clarified on reconsideration, 760 F.2d 119 (1985).

 
8. Federal Preemption. Former Section 9-104(a) [Maine cite
section 9-1104, subsection (1)] excluded from Article 9 [Maine
cite Article 9-A] "a security interest subject to any statute of
the United States, to the extent that such statute governs the
rights of parties to and third parties affected by transactions
in particular types of property." Some (erroneously) read the
former section to suggest that Article 9 sometimes deferred to
federal law even when federal law did not preempt Article 9.
Subsection (c)(1) [Maine cite subsection (3), paragraph (a)]
recognizes explicitly that this Article defers to federal law
only when and to the extent that it must-i.e., when federal law
preempts it.

 
9. Governmental Debtors. Former Section 9104(e) excluded
transfers by governmental debtors. It has been revised and
replaced by the exclusions in new paragraphs (2) and (3) of
subsection (c) [Maine cite paragraphs (b) and (c) of subsection


Page 80 of 493 Top of Page Page 82 of 493